[Sat Jun  9 10:09:07 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (286.1, 267.8) = 13 15 26.36 -16 23 38.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1696.0 +/- 53.8
  Background counts = 162.6
  Rate = 0.08 +/- 0.003

[Sat Jun  9 10:09:09 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.40'
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.63"
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.788
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 7.63"
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 1 at 10.275902 pixels away
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.63"
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.788
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 7.63"
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Source 1 is offset by 4.193664 and 3.819885 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.445793 x 1.445793, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 11268.000000, observed total counts = 9452.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 1
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00