[Sat Jun  9 10:08:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (260.2, 283.2) = 13 15 34.20 -16 22 48.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 575.8 +/- 84.7
  Background counts = 110.9
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.004

[Sat Jun  9 10:08:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.98'
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.92"
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.882
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 7.92"
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Source 6 is offset by -6.272507 and 6.031265 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.910913 x 0.910913, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.92"
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.882
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 7.92"
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Source 6 is offset by -0.937596 and 5.182254 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.335393 x 1.335393, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00