[Sat Jun  9 10:08:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (363.7, 189.0) = 13 15 2.89 -16 29 23.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 468.5 +/- 28.0
  Background counts = 14.5
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jun  9 10:08:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.24'
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.05"
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.839
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 11.05"
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Jun  9 13:53:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 1 at 13.862889 pixels away
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.05"
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:56 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.839
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 11.05"
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 1 at 15.269296 pixels away
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00