[Thu Jun  7 07:05:10 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (464.8, 306.5) = 11 50 6.66 -28 45 58.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 59.0 +/- 11.9
  Background counts = 26.4
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Thu Jun  7 07:05:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.08'
[Thu Jun  7 07:39:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  7 07:39:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.47"
[Thu Jun  7 07:39:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.081
[Thu Jun  7 07:39:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 29 for pass 0, mean size = 12.47"
[Thu Jun  7 08:26:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 08:26:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 08:26:24 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jun  7 08:26:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 08:26:24 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 08:26:24 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jun  7 08:57:52 2012] Warning: source 29 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 16.695911 pixels away
[Thu Jun  7 08:57:52 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  7 08:57:52 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  7 08:57:52 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  7 08:57:52 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  7 08:57:52 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  7 09:24:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  7 09:24:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.47"
[Thu Jun  7 09:24:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.081
[Thu Jun  7 09:24:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 12.47"
[Thu Jun  7 10:25:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 10:25:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Thu Jun  7 10:25:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 10:25:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Thu Jun  7 10:25:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  7 10:25:03 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 10:25:03 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  7 10:25:03 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0027340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jun  7 11:04:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 220.821000, observed total counts = 217.000000
[Thu Jun  7 11:04:23 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.693867 pixels
[Thu Jun  7 11:04:23 2012] 221.828100 total counts/ 200.370000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.515915
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.693867 pixels
  Position = (464.5, 307.1) = 11 50 6.75 -28 45 57.9
  Extent = 3.1" x 3.1", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 21.5 +/- 14.9
  Background counts = 200.4
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability