[Tue Jul  2 00:07:41 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (328.7, 338.9) = 18 36 30.45 -59 20 6.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 47.0 +/- 9.0
  Background counts = 8.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Tue Jul  2 00:07:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.66'
[Tue Jul  2 00:09:45 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul  2 00:09:45 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.26"
[Tue Jul  2 00:09:45 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.956
[Tue Jul  2 00:09:45 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 8.26"
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Tue Jul  2 00:37:25 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:34 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 52.022300, observed total counts = 45.000000
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:34 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:34 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:34 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:34 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:34 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:34 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:46 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:46 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.26"
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:46 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.956
[Tue Jul  2 01:37:46 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 8.26"
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Tue Jul  2 01:39:44 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0022940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  2 02:32:11 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 54.976700, observed total counts = 47.000000
[Tue Jul  2 02:32:11 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul  2 02:32:11 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul  2 02:32:11 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul  2 02:32:11 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul  2 02:32:11 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul  2 02:32:11 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul  2 02:32:11 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9