[Tue Jun 19 04:09:50 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (357.0, 226.4) = 16 47 42.00 -69 5 31.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 29.8 +/- 7.7
  Background counts = 6.9
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Tue Jun 19 04:09:50 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.73'
[Tue Jun 19 05:45:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 19 05:45:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.79"
[Tue Jun 19 05:45:01 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.991
[Tue Jun 19 05:45:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 9.79"
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:51 2012] Warning: source 24 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 29 at 13.182869 pixels away
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 19 06:22:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 19 07:41:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 19 07:41:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.79"
[Tue Jun 19 07:41:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.991
[Tue Jun 19 07:41:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 9.79"
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 19 08:16:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 19 08:17:05 2012] Warning: source 23 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 29 at 15.428515 pixels away
[Tue Jun 19 08:17:05 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 19 08:17:05 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 19 08:17:05 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 19 08:17:05 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 19 08:17:05 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 19 09:37:25 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(31009.220276, 19647.637039, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 19 09:37:25 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29_src.reg
[Tue Jun 19 09:37:25 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (319, 189) - (394, 264)
[Tue Jun 19 09:37:25 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(31009.220276, 19647.637039, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28466.412800, 21919.063000, 468.360013, 468.360013, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30748.477814, 17472.033020, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 19 09:37:25 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29.gif
[Tue Jun 19 09:42:15 2012] Mean detx,y = (5603.11, 5110.47) 
[Tue Jun 19 09:42:15 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Jun 19 09:42:39 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Jun 19 09:42:39 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 19 09:42:39 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 19 10:11:38 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 29 counts
[Tue Jun 19 10:11:38 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Jun 19 10:17:38 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Jun 19 10:17:38 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 19 10:17:40 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Jun 19 10:17:40 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00161, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0021750701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src29.arf
[Tue Jun 19 10:17:40 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Jun 19 10:17:40 2012] Updating source flux to 3.1e-14
[Tue Jun 19 10:18:40 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting