[Fri Sep 23 22:15:32 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (278.9, 317.1) = 15 6 37.95 1 36 15.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 53.8 +/- 11.8 Background counts = 19.7 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0008 [Fri Sep 23 22:15:32 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.96' [Fri Sep 23 23:08:28 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Sep 23 23:08:28 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.41" [Fri Sep 23 23:08:28 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.824 [Fri Sep 23 23:08:28 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 7.41" [Sat Sep 24 00:19:07 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists [Sat Sep 24 00:19:07 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv [Sat Sep 24 00:19:07 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists [Sat Sep 24 00:19:07 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv [Sat Sep 24 00:19:07 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Sep 24 00:19:07 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists [Sat Sep 24 00:19:07 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists [Sat Sep 24 00:19:07 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24 appears to have run properly [Sat Sep 24 01:51:46 2011] Warning, spatial fit 24 centroid is now closest to src. 5 [Sat Sep 24 01:51:46 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Sep 24 01:51:46 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Sep 24 01:51:46 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Sep 24 01:51:46 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Sep 24 01:51:46 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Sep 24 01:51:46 2011] Source is confused with source 21 [Sat Sep 24 03:00:35 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Sep 24 03:00:35 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.41" [Sat Sep 24 03:00:35 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.824 [Sat Sep 24 03:00:35 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 7.41" [Sat Sep 24 04:22:42 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists [Sat Sep 24 04:22:42 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists [Sat Sep 24 04:22:42 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21 appears to have run properly [Sat Sep 24 04:22:43 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists [Sat Sep 24 04:22:43 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists [Sat Sep 24 04:22:43 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0021540501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21 appears to have run properly [Sat Sep 24 05:52:26 2011] Source 20 is offset by -1.369822 and -7.513029 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.926000 x 1.926000, not incorporating fit results [Sat Sep 24 05:52:26 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Sep 24 05:52:26 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Sep 24 05:52:26 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Sep 24 05:52:26 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Sep 24 05:52:26 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Sep 24 05:52:26 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9