[Mon Sep 26 22:29:08 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (308.8, 265.8) = 12 43 34.94 11 32 28.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 951.0 +/- 40.1
  Background counts = 103.7
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.001

[Mon Sep 26 22:29:09 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.48'
[Mon Sep 26 22:33:01 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep 26 22:33:01 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.67"
[Mon Sep 26 22:33:01 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.781
[Mon Sep 26 22:33:01 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 7.67"
[Tue Sep 27 02:40:51 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 02:40:51 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Tue Sep 27 02:40:51 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 02:40:51 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Tue Sep 27 02:40:51 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep 27 02:40:53 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 02:40:53 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 02:40:53 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16 appears to have run properly
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:41 2011] Source 16 is offset by 5.958227 and -6.509149 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.741559 x 2.741559, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 2174.470000, observed total counts = 2172.000000
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 3.488685 pixels
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 16 to 40
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] 2092.396800 total counts/ 2012.250000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.786674
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 3.488685 pixels
  Position = (311.6, 263.7) = 12 43 34.12 11 32 16.8
  Extent = 7.0 (3.7-16.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 80.1 +/- 45.7
  Background counts = 2012.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0009
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:42 2011] Source is confused with source 42
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:27 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:27 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.01"
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:27 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.122
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:27 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 7.01"
[Tue Sep 27 11:35:12 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:35:12 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue Sep 27 11:35:12 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:35:12 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue Sep 27 11:35:12 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep 27 11:35:13 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:35:13 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:35:13 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16 appears to have run properly
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:36 2011] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 44
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:36 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 2180.110000, observed total counts = 2172.000000
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:36 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 0.897388 pixels
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:36 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 16 to 38
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:36 2011] 2078.817500 total counts/ 2002.650000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.702030
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 0.897388 pixels
  Position = (311.1, 264.4) = 12 43 34.25 11 32 20.2
  Extent = 8.3 (3.3-16.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 76.2 +/- 45.6
  Background counts = 2002.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0009
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability