[Mon Sep 26 22:30:13 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (277.9, 303.1) = 12 43 44.07 11 35 5.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 84.8 +/- 14.5
  Background counts = 41.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Mon Sep 26 22:30:13 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.52'
[Tue Sep 27 05:52:31 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep 27 05:52:31 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.19"
[Tue Sep 27 05:52:31 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.647
[Tue Sep 27 05:52:31 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 0, mean size = 7.19"
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:21 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:21 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:21 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:21 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:21 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:22 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:22 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 07:51:22 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40 appears to have run properly
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:08 2011] Source 44 is offset by -4.399251 and 5.686309 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.273848 x 3.273848, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:09 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:09 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:09 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:09 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep 27 07:52:09 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Sep 27 13:26:37 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep 27 13:26:37 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.19"
[Tue Sep 27 13:26:37 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.647
[Tue Sep 27 13:26:37 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 36 for pass 1, mean size = 7.19"
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.csv
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.csv
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.csv
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.csv
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:19 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:57 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1338.500000, observed total counts = 1338.000000
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:57 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 0.809425 pixels
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:57 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 36 to 15
[Tue Sep 27 14:58:57 2011] 1334.505600 total counts/ 1293.470000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.140992
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 0.809425 pixels
  Position = (278.1, 302.3) = 12 43 44.01 11 35 4.7
  Extent = 5.0 (3.9-7.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 41.0 +/- 36.5
  Background counts = 1293.5
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability