[Mon Jun 18 20:00:25 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (295.3, 275.2) = 17 33 0.79 43 44 38.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 95.0 +/- 15.4
  Background counts = 35.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Mon Jun 18 20:00:25 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.70'
[Mon Jun 18 21:07:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 18 21:07:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.28"
[Mon Jun 18 21:07:58 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.847
[Mon Jun 18 21:07:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 7.28"
[Mon Jun 18 21:55:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 18 21:55:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 18 21:55:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun 18 21:55:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 18 21:55:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Mon Jun 18 21:55:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 18 21:55:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Mon Jun 18 21:55:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 18 21:56:09 2012] Warning, spatial fit 7 centroid is now closest to src. 6
[Mon Jun 18 21:56:09 2012] Source 7 is offset by 1.050239 and -4.204603 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.850115 x 0.850115, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 18 21:56:09 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 18 21:56:09 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 18 21:56:09 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 18 21:56:09 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 18 21:56:09 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 18 21:56:09 2012] Source is confused with source 14
[Mon Jun 18 22:54:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 18 22:54:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.28"
[Mon Jun 18 22:54:00 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.847
[Mon Jun 18 22:54:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 7.28"
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:16 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:16 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 34.824310 pixels away
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 18 23:56:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 19 00:34:27 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(25638.682770, 23892.265564, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 19 00:34:27 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_src.reg
[Tue Jun 19 00:34:27 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (258, 238) - (333, 313)
[Tue Jun 19 00:34:27 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(25638.682770, 23892.265564, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25041.025600, 25048.970000, 1105.304032, 1105.304032, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25498.051200, 25425.872400, 1064.864031, 1064.864031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25763.957672, 24663.790527, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24979.746000, 26010.318000, 1126.368032, 1126.368032, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26259.814000, 24331.776000, 1112.624032, 1112.624032, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26594.219849, 25699.063446, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26140.916077, 23619.485199, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24587.503571, 26538.610260, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 19 00:34:27 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7.gif
[Tue Jun 19 00:35:26 2012] Mean detx,y = (-41.11, -126.70) 
[Tue Jun 19 00:35:27 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Jun 19 00:35:35 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Jun 19 00:35:36 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 19 00:35:36 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 19 00:47:15 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 95 counts
[Tue Jun 19 00:47:15 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Jun 19 00:47:50 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Jun 19 00:47:50 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 19 00:47:50 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Jun 19 00:47:50 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0113, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0021140901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7.arf
[Tue Jun 19 00:47:50 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Jun 19 00:47:50 2012] Updating source flux to 1.2e-13
[Tue Jun 19 00:48:05 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting