[Thu Jun 14 14:06:36 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (411.6, 214.4) = 17 32 21.94 43 39 47.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 66.6 +/- 11.7 Background counts = 33.7 Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.008 [Thu Jun 14 14:06:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.22' [Thu Jun 14 14:08:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.54 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jun 14 14:08:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.54" [Thu Jun 14 14:08:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.856 [Thu Jun 14 14:08:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 0, mean size = 11.54" [Thu Jun 14 19:46:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg exists [Thu Jun 14 19:46:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv [Thu Jun 14 19:46:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 14 19:46:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv [Thu Jun 14 19:46:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 14 19:46:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists [Thu Jun 14 19:46:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.csv [Thu Jun 14 19:46:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 14 19:46:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.csv [Thu Jun 14 19:46:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 465.190000, observed total counts = 399.000000 [Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Source is confused with source 92 [Thu Jun 14 20:07:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.54 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jun 14 20:07:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.54" [Thu Jun 14 20:07:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.856 [Thu Jun 14 20:07:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 80 for pass 1, mean size = 11.54" [Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.csv [Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.csv [Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 15 01:34:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 01:34:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.csv [Fri Jun 15 01:34:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 01:34:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.csv [Fri Jun 15 01:34:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Source 95 is offset by 5.621745 and -3.644725 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.241618 x 1.241618, not incorporating fit results [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 877.772000, observed total counts = 771.000000 [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2519.560000, observed total counts = 1441.000000 [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jun 15 01:47:38 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(35756.757812, 18606.242950, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri Jun 15 01:47:38 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src.reg [Fri Jun 15 01:47:38 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (374, 177) - (449, 252) [Fri Jun 15 01:47:38 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(35756.757812, 18606.242950, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33916.636658, 21089.852936, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34611.014435, 20585.673492, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35041.207400, 20819.346000, 1081.960031, 1081.960031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35568.136566, 20278.837067, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34370.540466, 19695.580231, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35739.176208, 19773.457550, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34796.154938, 19428.674118, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36225.452000, 19356.324000, 1800.952052, 1800.952052, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37149.292000, 18562.636000, 3601.904104, 3601.904104, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36521.987701, 18391.290451, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38093.782000, 17876.338000, 1963.304056, 1963.304056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37447.907928, 17593.548401, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37465.372711, 16748.100784, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36971.982000, 17510.444800, 1946.408056, 1946.408056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37948.234924, 17308.331879, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri Jun 15 01:47:38 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.gif [Fri Jun 15 02:43:07 2012] Mean detx,y = (11098.47, 330.22) [Fri Jun 15 02:43:09 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Fri Jun 15 02:43:20 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Fri Jun 15 02:43:20 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri Jun 15 02:43:20 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_bgd.pi.gz [Fri Jun 15 03:50:24 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 66 counts [Fri Jun 15 03:50:24 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Fri Jun 15 04:03:53 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Fri Jun 15 04:03:53 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri Jun 15 04:03:54 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Fri Jun 15 04:03:54 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0446, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.arf [Fri Jun 15 04:03:54 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Fri Jun 15 04:03:54 2012] Updating source flux to 2.2e-13 [Fri Jun 15 04:04:06 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting