[Thu Jun 14 14:06:36 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (411.4, 227.8) = 17 32 22.01 43 40 48.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 58.7 +/- 11.9
  Background counts = 27.7
  Rate = 0.08 +/- 0.02

[Thu Jun 14 14:06:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.65'
[Thu Jun 14 14:08:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 14 14:08:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.26"
[Thu Jun 14 14:08:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.944
[Thu Jun 14 14:08:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 90 for pass 0, mean size = 11.26"
[Thu Jun 14 19:46:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 19:46:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 19:46:36 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jun 14 19:46:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 19:46:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 19:46:40 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Warning, spatial fit 90 centroid is now closest to src. 92
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 406.859000, observed total counts = 346.000000
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 90
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:43 2012] Source is confused with source 85
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.26"
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.944
[Thu Jun 14 20:07:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 75 for pass 1, mean size = 11.26"
[Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.csv
[Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.csv
[Fri Jun 15 01:34:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 15 01:34:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 15 01:34:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 15 01:34:10 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Warning, spatial fit 75 centroid is now closest to src. 92
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Source 90 is offset by -7.560710 and -0.769545 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.326018 x 1.326018, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:37 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(35739.176208, 19773.457550, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:37 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_src.reg
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:37 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (374, 190) - (449, 265)
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:37 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(35739.176208, 19773.457550, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33269.154663, 22255.678955, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33916.636658, 21089.852936, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34611.014435, 20585.673492, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35041.207400, 20819.346000, 1081.960031, 1081.960031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35568.136566, 20278.837067, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34370.540466, 19695.580231, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34796.154938, 19428.674118, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36225.452000, 19356.324000, 1800.952052, 1800.952052, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37149.292000, 18562.636000, 3601.904104, 3601.904104, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35756.757812, 18606.242950, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36521.987701, 18391.290451, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38093.782000, 17876.338000, 1963.304056, 1963.304056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37447.907928, 17593.548401, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37465.372711, 16748.100784, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36971.982000, 17510.444800, 1946.408056, 1946.408056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37948.234924, 17308.331879, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 15 01:47:37 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90.gif
[Fri Jun 15 02:34:27 2012] Mean detx,y = (10351.24, -462.89) 
[Fri Jun 15 02:34:29 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri Jun 15 02:34:44 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri Jun 15 02:34:44 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Jun 15 02:34:44 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_bgd.pi.gz
[Fri Jun 15 03:42:41 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 58 counts
[Fri Jun 15 03:42:41 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Fri Jun 15 04:03:53 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Fri Jun 15 04:03:53 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Jun 15 04:03:54 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Fri Jun 15 04:03:54 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0752, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0021140501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90.arf
[Fri Jun 15 04:03:54 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Fri Jun 15 04:03:54 2012] Updating source flux to 3.1e-13
[Fri Jun 15 04:04:06 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting