[Fri May  3 16:32:24 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (325.7, 273.7) = 22 34 15.17 -37 44 58.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 56.9 +/- 11.2
  Background counts = 23.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.004

[Fri May  3 16:32:24 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.67'
[Fri May  3 16:33:42 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 16:33:42 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.76"
[Fri May  3 16:33:42 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 23, frac = 1.102
[Fri May  3 16:33:42 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 7.76"
[Fri May  3 17:54:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 17:54:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Fri May  3 17:54:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 17:54:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Fri May  3 17:54:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 17:54:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 17:54:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Fri May  3 17:54:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 17:54:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Fri May  3 17:54:32 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 21:45:34 2013] Source 28 is offset by 4.468933 and -2.513900 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.138713 x 2.209145, not incorporating fit results
[Fri May  3 21:45:34 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 21:45:34 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 21:45:34 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  3 21:45:34 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 21:45:34 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  3 21:45:51 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 21:45:51 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.76"
[Fri May  3 21:45:51 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 23, frac = 1.102
[Fri May  3 21:45:51 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 7.76"
[Fri May  3 22:59:26 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 22:59:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Fri May  3 22:59:26 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 22:59:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Fri May  3 22:59:26 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 22:59:27 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 22:59:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri May  3 22:59:27 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 22:59:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri May  3 22:59:27 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0018741701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 01:56:58 2013] Source 28 is offset by -3.444975 and 5.799252 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.208294 x 7.138713, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 01:56:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  4 01:56:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  4 01:56:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  4 01:56:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  4 01:56:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  4 01:56:58 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9