[Mon Jun 24 16:07:28 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (447.0, 189.9) = 20 56 36.38 30 51 3.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 178.7 +/- 23.2 Background counts = 114.0 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Mon Jun 24 16:07:34 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.34' [Mon Jun 24 16:08:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jun 24 16:08:57 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Mon Jun 24 16:08:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.10" [Mon Jun 24 16:08:57 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.136 [Mon Jun 24 16:08:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 0, mean size = 13.10" [Mon Jun 24 16:09:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg exists [Mon Jun 24 16:09:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv [Mon Jun 24 16:09:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 24 16:09:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv [Mon Jun 24 16:09:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 24 16:09:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists [Mon Jun 24 16:09:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv [Mon Jun 24 16:09:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 24 16:09:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv [Mon Jun 24 16:09:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 24 16:10:18 2013] Warning, spatial fit 69 centroid is now closest to src. 93 [Mon Jun 24 16:10:18 2013] Warning: source 100 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 19 at 11.202390 pixels away [Mon Jun 24 16:10:18 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 24 16:10:18 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 24 16:10:18 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jun 24 16:10:18 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 24 16:10:18 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jun 24 16:10:18 2013] Source is confused with source 93 [Mon Jun 24 16:10:18 2013] Source is confused with source 94 [Mon Jun 24 16:11:13 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jun 24 16:11:13 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.10" [Mon Jun 24 16:11:13 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.136 [Mon Jun 24 16:11:13 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 1, mean size = 13.10" [Mon Jun 24 16:11:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg exists [Mon Jun 24 16:11:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv [Mon Jun 24 16:11:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 24 16:11:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv [Mon Jun 24 16:11:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 24 16:11:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists [Mon Jun 24 16:11:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.csv [Mon Jun 24 16:11:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 24 16:11:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.csv [Mon Jun 24 16:11:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 24 16:12:33 2013] Warning, spatial fit 58 centroid is now closest to src. 94 [Mon Jun 24 16:12:33 2013] Source 19 is offset by -4.275653 and 0.690566 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.731246 x 1.731246, not incorporating fit results [Mon Jun 24 16:12:33 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 24 16:12:33 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 24 16:12:33 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jun 24 16:12:33 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 24 16:12:33 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jun 24 22:42:26 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(38839.690216, 16469.191284, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Jun 24 22:42:26 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src.reg [Mon Jun 24 22:42:26 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (409, 152) - (484, 227) [Mon Jun 24 22:42:26 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(38839.690216, 16469.191284, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33778.659800, 19949.622000, 3380.464097, 3380.464097, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34833.310000, 20218.966000, 2204.280063, 2204.280063, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38287.879547, 16284.014938, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38756.285126, 15961.653229, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38709.896454, 15432.604126, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38055.623800, 16556.576000, 1101.440032, 1101.440032, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Jun 24 22:42:26 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19.gif [Mon Jun 24 23:02:12 2013] Mean detx,y = (-12764.44, -9223.77) [Mon Jun 24 23:02:13 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Mon Jun 24 23:02:27 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Mon Jun 24 23:02:27 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Jun 24 23:02:27 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0018141301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_bgd.pi.gz