[Sun May 19 20:30:41 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (451.7, 292.9) = 20 56 34.76 30 58 29.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 114.3 +/- 20.7
  Background counts = 139.0
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Sun May 19 20:30:43 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.12'
[Sun May 19 20:32:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 19 20:32:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.99"
[Sun May 19 20:32:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.991
[Sun May 19 20:32:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 0, mean size = 11.99"
[Sun May 19 20:32:22 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 20:32:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.csv
[Sun May 19 20:32:22 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 20:32:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.csv
[Sun May 19 20:32:22 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 19 20:32:25 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 20:32:25 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 20:32:25 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 19 20:33:22 2013] Warning, spatial fit 68 centroid is now closest to src. 134
[Sun May 19 20:33:22 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 19 20:33:22 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 19 20:33:22 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 19 20:33:22 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 19 20:33:22 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 19 20:33:22 2013] Source is confused with source 140
[Sun May 19 20:34:29 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 19 20:34:29 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.99"
[Sun May 19 20:34:29 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.991
[Sun May 19 20:34:29 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 1, mean size = 11.99"
[Sun May 19 20:34:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 20:34:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 20:34:31 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 19 20:34:34 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 20:34:34 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 19 20:34:34 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0018141101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 19 20:35:31 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2194.200000, observed total counts = 2118.000000
[Sun May 19 20:35:31 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 143 = 1.107387 pixels
[Sun May 19 20:35:31 2013] 2065.487300 total counts/ 2035.420000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.666450
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 143 = 1.107387 pixels
  Position = (451.5, 291.8) = 20 56 34.82 30 58 28.7
  Extent = 3.2 (3.0-7.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 30.1 +/- 45.4
  Background counts = 2035.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability