[Mon Jul 16 18:07:17 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (321.0, 318.1) = 20 57 7.91 31 2 43.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 150.7 +/- 23.9 Background counts = 177.0 Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.006 [Mon Jul 16 18:07:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.17' [Mon Jul 16 18:13:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jul 16 18:13:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.51" [Mon Jul 16 18:13:59 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.807 [Mon Jul 16 18:13:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 7.51" [Tue Jul 17 00:54:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists [Tue Jul 17 00:54:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv [Tue Jul 17 00:54:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 17 00:54:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv [Tue Jul 17 00:54:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 17 00:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists [Tue Jul 17 00:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv [Tue Jul 17 00:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 17 00:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv [Tue Jul 17 00:54:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 17 13:29:59 2012] Warning, spatial fit 92 centroid is now closest to src. 37 [Tue Jul 17 13:29:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 17 13:29:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 17 13:29:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 17 13:29:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 17 13:29:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 17 13:29:59 2012] Source is confused with source 34 [Tue Jul 17 13:31:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 17 13:31:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.51" [Tue Jul 17 13:31:49 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.807 [Tue Jul 17 13:31:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 72 for pass 1, mean size = 7.51" [Tue Jul 17 20:30:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.ximg exists [Tue Jul 17 20:30:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.csv [Tue Jul 17 20:30:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 17 20:30:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.csv [Tue Jul 17 20:30:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 17 20:30:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.ximg exists [Tue Jul 17 20:30:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.csv [Tue Jul 17 20:30:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 17 20:30:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.csv [Tue Jul 17 20:30:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 18 08:19:19 2012] Source 94 is offset by 6.014310 and -3.974026 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.867439 x 0.867439, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jul 18 08:19:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 72 centroid is now closest to src. 34 [Wed Jul 18 08:19:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jul 18 08:19:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jul 18 08:19:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jul 18 08:19:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jul 18 08:19:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jul 18 08:20:39 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(27874.482941, 27625.021698, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Jul 18 08:20:39 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src.reg [Wed Jul 18 08:20:39 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (283, 281) - (358, 356) [Wed Jul 18 08:20:39 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(27874.482941, 27625.021698, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24617.996800, 24744.964600, 1139.928033, 1139.928033, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27236.851105, 24584.160889, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25197.897461, 29005.275848, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27901.115540, 29007.968048, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28006.979523, 28144.669342, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27412.786621, 27004.445770, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27768.111847, 26572.400818, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27461.477203, 25699.395325, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27370.144196, 25094.311493, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26140.156738, 28145.253448, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27997.663025, 30661.260101, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25303.612762, 30041.024017, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26150.854200, 30521.700000, 1203.176035, 1203.176035, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25303.089722, 29521.671082, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28610.409271, 28850.761108, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26738.701233, 28469.703339, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25551.157074, 27962.430786, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28413.857452, 27872.799652, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24154.624200, 27557.918000, 1754.032050, 1754.032050, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25971.352631, 26412.621155, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28334.315430, 26329.216064, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28082.127472, 25954.397614, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26337.592682, 25289.594208, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Jul 18 08:20:39 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94.gif [Wed Jul 18 08:56:27 2012] Mean detx,y = (-2845.15, 3426.77) [Wed Jul 18 08:56:28 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed Jul 18 08:56:44 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed Jul 18 08:56:44 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Jul 18 08:56:44 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_bgd.pi.gz [Wed Jul 18 09:59:37 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed Jul 18 09:59:38 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed Jul 18 18:35:40 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed Jul 18 18:35:40 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Jul 18 18:35:42 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed Jul 18 18:35:42 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.038, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0018140301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94.arf [Wed Jul 18 18:35:42 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed Jul 18 18:35:42 2012] Updating source flux to 1.2e-13 [Wed Jul 18 18:52:40 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting