[Sun May 27 10:09:38 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (327.9, 330.5) = 18 41 15.09 -4 55 14.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 444.9 +/- 27.9
  Background counts = 31.2
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.007

[Sun May 27 10:09:38 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.16'
[Sun May 27 10:11:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 27 10:11:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.01"
[Sun May 27 10:11:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.867
[Sun May 27 10:11:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.01"
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 11:54:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun May 27 11:54:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 11:54:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun May 27 11:54:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4428.840000, observed total counts = 3735.000000
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2891.080000, observed total counts = 1902.000000
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Source is confused with source 12
[Sun May 27 15:16:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 27 15:16:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.01"
[Sun May 27 15:16:31 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.867
[Sun May 27 15:16:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 8.01"
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun May 27 16:15:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 27 19:36:30 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2796.030000, observed total counts = 1902.000000
[Sun May 27 19:36:30 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 27 19:36:30 2012] Source 9 is offset by 5.447427 and -6.033090 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.936818 x 0.936818, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 27 19:36:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 27 19:36:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 27 19:36:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 27 19:36:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 27 19:36:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 27 19:36:48 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28482.450134, 28702.597198, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May 27 19:36:48 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg
[Sun May 27 19:36:48 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (290, 293) - (365, 368)
[Sun May 27 19:36:48 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28482.450134, 28702.597198, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29113.739105, 27008.672577, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27075.593920, 26247.605400, 1062.160031, 717.586421, 24.721000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28002.190000, 26096.830600, 1154.136033, 1154.136033, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27234.275600, 27542.016000, 1377.849640, 1377.849640, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29175.496200, 27303.244000, 1253.896036, 1253.896036, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28492.183472, 27181.891998, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25864.961520, 27633.639000, 598.235217, 598.235217, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28510.837708, 27785.581940, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26764.012000, 28902.849600, 832.824024, 832.824024, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29047.158936, 28688.432617, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25633.012000, 25857.849600, 832.824024, 832.824024, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26360.574000, 29236.126000, 848.568024, 848.568024, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27366.721863, 29784.457916, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May 27 19:36:48 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif
[Sun May 27 19:52:11 2012] Mean detx,y = (1267.62, -1566.32) 
[Sun May 27 19:52:14 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun May 27 19:52:32 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun May 27 19:52:32 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May 27 19:52:32 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz
[Mon May 28 01:52:26 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Mon May 28 01:52:26 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Mon May 28 04:07:22 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Mon May 28 04:07:22 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon May 28 04:07:22 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Mon May 28 04:07:22 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.113, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf
[Mon May 28 04:07:22 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Mon May 28 04:07:22 2012] Updating source flux to 3.1e-13
[Mon May 28 04:11:02 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting