[Sun May 27 10:09:38 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (294.1, 300.0) = 18 41 24.94 -4 57 26.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 327.9 +/- 25.3
  Background counts = 22.1
  Rate = 0.08 +/- 0.006

[Sun May 27 10:09:38 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.33'
[Sun May 27 10:11:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 27 10:11:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.60"
[Sun May 27 10:11:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.984
[Sun May 27 10:11:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 6.60"
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Sun May 27 11:54:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 27 11:54:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 11:54:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 11:54:49 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0013340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2296.290000, observed total counts = 1827.000000
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 15
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2157.000000, observed total counts = 2159.000000
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 1.343267 pixels
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 15 to 14
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] 2194.446000 total counts/ 1989.340000 bgd. counts: snr = 4.598581
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 1.343267 pixels
  Position = (294.8, 298.8) = 18 41 24.74 -4 57 31.7
  Extent = 13.0 (11.7-25.9)" x 5.5 (4.1-7.1)", rotation angle = 54 (43-66) degrees
  Source counts = 205.1 +/- 46.8
  Background counts = 1989.3
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.01
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1922.550000, observed total counts = 1769.000000
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.908713 pixels
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 14 to 15
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] 1993.166700 total counts/ 1909.370000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.917705
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.908713 pixels
  Position = (294.2, 299.5) = 18 41 24.90 -4 57 28.6
  Extent = 4.8 (3.4-8.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 83.8 +/- 44.6
  Background counts = 1909.4
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.01
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 27 15:16:12 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9