[Sat May 18 18:11:07 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (312.8, 356.1) = 0 56 15.88 -1 15 16.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 281.8 +/- 32.1
  Background counts = 330.1
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sat May 18 18:11:07 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.31'
[Sat May 18 18:14:27 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 18 18:14:27 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.58"
[Sat May 18 18:14:27 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.022
[Sat May 18 18:14:27 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 8.58"
[Sat May 18 19:04:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 19:04:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sat May 18 19:04:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 19:04:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sat May 18 19:04:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 18 19:04:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 19:04:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sat May 18 19:04:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 19:04:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sat May 18 19:04:29 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 4667.040000, observed total counts = 3028.000000
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 14
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Source 14 is offset by -4.405414 and 1.170523 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.322575 x 4.322575, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 4552.640000, observed total counts = 3720.000000
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 14
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 18 20:05:30 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 18 20:05:47 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 18 20:05:47 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.58"
[Sat May 18 20:05:47 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.022
[Sat May 18 20:05:47 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 8.58"
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sat May 18 21:01:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0012440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 18 21:51:46 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 4659.090000, observed total counts = 3028.000000
[Sat May 18 21:51:46 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 14
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 18 21:51:46 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 4480.720000, observed total counts = 4479.000000
[Sat May 18 21:51:46 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 4.512151 pixels
[Sat May 18 21:51:46 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 13 to 10
[Sat May 18 21:51:46 2013] 4195.677000 total counts/ 4094.760000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.577067
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 4.512151 pixels
  Position = (317.1, 354.9) = 0 56 14.62 -1 15 23.7
  Extent = 9.8 (2.2-17.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 100.9 +/- 64.8
  Background counts = 4094.8
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability