[Sun Jun  9 22:08:05 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (261.9, 440.0) = 6 40 57.43 9 59 46.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 86.4 +/- 14.2
  Background counts = 33.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun Jun  9 22:08:07 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.60'
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:18 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:18 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.73"
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:18 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.881
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:18 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 11.73"
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:22 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] Source 97 is offset by 2.156223 and -1.251926 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.411389 x 1.411389, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 761.916000, observed total counts = 715.000000
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 97 = 0.074505 pixels
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] 469.064000 total counts/ 425.944000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.089308
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 97 = 0.074505 pixels
  Position = (262.0, 440.0) = 6 40 57.43 9 59 45.7
  Extent = 3.8 (2.9-5.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 43.1 +/- 21.7
  Background counts = 425.9
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0006
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 22:09:55 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9