[Sun Jun 9 22:08:16 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (415.6, 227.5) = 6 40 12.23 9 44 21.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 44.2 +/- 9.7 Background counts = 15.9 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Sun Jun 9 22:08:17 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.93' [Sun Jun 9 22:09:27 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 9 22:09:27 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.39" [Sun Jun 9 22:09:27 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.259 [Sun Jun 9 22:09:27 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 11.39" [Sun Jun 9 22:09:29 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 22:09:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv [Sun Jun 9 22:09:29 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 22:09:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv [Sun Jun 9 22:09:29 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 9 22:09:30 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 22:09:30 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 22:09:30 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0011420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] Warning: source 87 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 115 at 12.064916 pixels away [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 165.975000, observed total counts = 166.000000 [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 115 = 0.248896 pixels [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] 165.456200 total counts/ 135.559000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.567830 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 115 = 0.248896 pixels Position = (415.3, 227.6) = 6 40 12.29 9 44 21.6 Extent = 4.5 (3.3-6.1)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 29.9 +/- 12.9 Background counts = 135.6 Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0003 [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 9 22:10:26 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9