[Fri Jul 13 08:05:09 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (282.9, 294.9) = 16 28 45.76 39 31 18.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 99.2 +/- 18.9 Background counts = 111.3 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003 [Fri Jul 13 08:05:09 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.15' [Fri Jul 13 12:28:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jul 13 12:28:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.01" [Fri Jul 13 12:28:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.898 [Fri Jul 13 12:28:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 7.01" [Fri Jul 13 14:24:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 14:24:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv [Fri Jul 13 14:24:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 14:24:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv [Fri Jul 13 14:24:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jul 13 14:24:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 14:24:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 14:24:12 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24 appears to have run properly [Fri Jul 13 15:48:23 2012] Source 27 is offset by 5.633711 and 5.340980 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.632262 x 1.632262, not incorporating fit results [Fri Jul 13 15:48:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jul 13 15:48:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jul 13 15:48:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jul 13 15:48:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jul 13 15:48:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jul 13 17:39:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jul 13 17:39:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.01" [Fri Jul 13 17:39:55 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.898 [Fri Jul 13 17:39:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 7.01" [Fri Jul 13 19:00:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 19:00:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 19:00:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20 appears to have run properly [Fri Jul 13 19:00:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 19:00:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 19:00:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0008030601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20 appears to have run properly [Fri Jul 13 20:54:17 2012] Source 27 is offset by 6.317182 and -5.869916 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.670437 x 1.670437, not incorporating fit results [Fri Jul 13 20:54:17 2012] Source 27 is offset by 5.632884 and 5.340980 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.558515 x 1.558515, not incorporating fit results [Fri Jul 13 20:54:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jul 13 20:54:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jul 13 20:54:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jul 13 20:54:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jul 13 20:54:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jul 13 20:54:17 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9