[Fri Jul  6 21:51:37 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (315.4, 315.3) = 16 28 28.16 39 32 40.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 580.7 +/- 37.9
  Background counts = 382.2
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.002

[Fri Jul  6 21:51:38 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.73'
[Sat Jul  7 01:24:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul  7 01:24:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.29"
[Sat Jul  7 01:24:43 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.791
[Sat Jul  7 01:24:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 7.29"
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:30 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:48 2012] Warning, spatial fit 7 centroid is now closest to src. 5
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jul  7 02:44:48 2012] Source is confused with source 15
[Sat Jul  7 09:36:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul  7 09:36:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.29"
[Sat Jul  7 09:36:37 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.791
[Sat Jul  7 09:36:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 7.29"
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sat Jul  7 11:35:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0008030201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul  7 11:36:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5844.010000, observed total counts = 5215.000000
[Sat Jul  7 11:36:06 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jul  7 11:36:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4402.310000, observed total counts = 4283.000000
[Sat Jul  7 11:36:06 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 0.719265 pixels
[Sat Jul  7 11:36:06 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 7 to 14
[Sat Jul  7 11:36:06 2012] 4210.458200 total counts/ 4148.630000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.959918
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 0.719265 pixels
  Position = (315.6, 314.6) = 16 28 28.08 39 32 41.9
  Extent = 5.2 (1.9-15.1)", rotation angle = 171 (128-224) degrees
  Source counts = 61.8 +/- 64.9
  Background counts = 4148.6
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability