[Sat May  4 01:08:26 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (271.4, 295.8) = 22 42 41.72 29 44 23.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 199.0 +/- 22.9
  Background counts = 41.4
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Sat May  4 01:08:26 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.97'
[Sat May  4 01:34:56 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  4 01:34:56 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.41"
[Sat May  4 01:34:56 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.772
[Sat May  4 01:34:56 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 7.41"
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat May  4 02:13:26 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 02:13:33 2013] Warning, spatial fit 2 centroid is now closest to src. 2
[Sat May  4 02:13:33 2013] Source 3 is offset by -3.576219 and 1.791029 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.874386 x 0.874386, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 02:13:33 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  4 02:13:33 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  4 02:13:33 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  4 02:13:33 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  4 02:13:33 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  4 02:22:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  4 02:22:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.41"
[Sat May  4 02:22:55 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.772
[Sat May  4 02:22:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 7.41"
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat May  4 02:32:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 02:32:57 2013] Source 3 is offset by -6.397369 and 6.602386 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.816230 x 2.275326, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 02:32:57 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  4 02:32:57 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  4 02:32:57 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  4 02:32:57 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  4 02:32:57 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  4 02:32:57 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0