[Thu Jun 14 10:11:34 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (269.1, 292.9) = 22 42 42.36 29 44 1.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 151.7 +/- 21.9
  Background counts = 5.2
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.004

[Thu Jun 14 10:11:34 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.16'
[Thu Jun 14 10:36:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 14 10:36:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.51"
[Thu Jun 14 10:36:15 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.605
[Thu Jun 14 10:36:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 7.51"
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:50 2012] Source 3 is offset by 7.051479 and -4.452244 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.932961 x 2.932961, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:50 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:50 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:50 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:50 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:50 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 14 11:13:50 2012] Source is confused with source 2
[Thu Jun 14 14:04:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 14 14:04:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.51"
[Thu Jun 14 14:04:55 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.605
[Thu Jun 14 14:04:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 7.51"
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0006810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 3
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:59 2012] Source 3 is offset by -6.758038 and 5.810285 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.053223 x 2.053223, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 14 14:24:59 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9