[Fri May 25 03:24:42 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (194.4, 372.3) = 0 27 38.65 -77 11 6.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 257.9 +/- 20.0
  Background counts = 25.7
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0006

[Fri May 25 03:24:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.25'
[Fri May 25 03:27:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 25 03:27:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.05"
[Fri May 25 03:27:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.703
[Fri May 25 03:27:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 11.05"
[Fri May 25 04:30:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 25 04:30:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 25 04:30:55 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri May 25 04:30:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 25 04:30:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 25 04:30:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 25 04:30:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 25 04:30:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 25 05:40:21 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 17.602092 pixels away
[Fri May 25 05:40:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 25 05:40:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 25 05:40:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 25 05:40:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 25 05:40:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 25 05:40:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 25 05:40:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.05"
[Fri May 25 05:40:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.703
[Fri May 25 05:40:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.05"
[Fri May 25 06:42:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 25 06:42:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri May 25 06:42:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 25 06:42:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri May 25 06:42:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 25 06:42:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 25 06:42:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 25 06:42:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 25 06:42:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 25 06:42:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 25 07:53:37 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 22
[Fri May 25 07:53:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 25 07:53:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 25 07:53:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 25 07:53:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 25 07:53:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 25 07:53:54 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(16865.915054, 32340.088226, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri May 25 07:53:54 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg
[Fri May 25 07:53:54 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (157, 335) - (232, 410)
[Fri May 25 07:53:54 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(16865.915054, 32340.088226, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19863.030273, 31746.590942, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16249.016342, 34852.454834, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18887.780200, 33548.268000, 433.156012, 433.156012, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16909.924820, 33193.438538, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri May 25 07:53:54 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif
[Fri May 25 07:59:23 2012] Mean detx,y = (3652.14, -8611.64) 
[Fri May 25 07:59:25 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri May 25 07:59:45 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri May 25 07:59:45 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri May 25 07:59:45 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz
[Fri May 25 08:36:22 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Fri May 25 08:36:22 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Fri May 25 09:25:44 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Fri May 25 09:25:44 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri May 25 09:25:44 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Fri May 25 09:25:44 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00783, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0006010401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf
[Fri May 25 09:25:44 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Fri May 25 09:25:44 2012] Updating source flux to 5.7e-14
[Fri May 25 09:26:23 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting