[Wed Jun 5 08:10:25 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (244.2, 284.3) = 17 34 56.54 -32 34 20.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 175.4 +/- 17.1 Background counts = 50.8 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001 [Wed Jun 5 08:10:26 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.06' [Wed Jun 5 08:13:08 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jun 5 08:13:08 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.46" [Wed Jun 5 08:13:08 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.544 [Wed Jun 5 08:13:08 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 8.46" [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv [Wed Jun 5 09:42:35 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 5 11:40:59 2013] Source 12 is offset by -2.352102 and 0.706706 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.925991 x 0.925991, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jun 5 11:40:59 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 404.590000, observed total counts = 305.000000 [Wed Jun 5 11:40:59 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed Jun 5 11:41:00 2013] Source 12 is offset by -3.775688 and 3.283119 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.001959 x 1.001959, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jun 5 11:41:00 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jun 5 11:41:00 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jun 5 11:41:00 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jun 5 11:41:00 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jun 5 11:41:00 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jun 5 11:41:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jun 5 11:41:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.46" [Wed Jun 5 11:41:20 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.544 [Wed Jun 5 11:41:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 8.46" [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv [Wed Jun 5 12:47:29 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 5 15:01:39 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 408.881000, observed total counts = 305.000000 [Wed Jun 5 15:01:39 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed Jun 5 15:01:39 2013] Source 12 is offset by -3.775688 and 3.283119 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.001959 x 1.001959, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jun 5 15:01:39 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jun 5 15:01:39 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jun 5 15:01:39 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jun 5 15:01:39 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jun 5 15:01:39 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jun 5 15:01:59 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(21200.379150, 24685.495392, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Jun 5 15:01:59 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_src.reg [Wed Jun 5 15:01:59 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (207, 247) - (282, 322) [Wed Jun 5 15:01:59 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(21200.379150, 24685.495392, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24735.936840, 24049.108200, 1478.126443, 1419.655241, 32.174200, X, Y) && !ellipse(20004.964157, 24744.163574, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23373.122320, 24720.271200, 347.644810, 347.644810, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22080.318400, 25167.238600, 516.335215, 379.811211, 97.094990, X, Y) && !ellipse(23352.410492, 23588.046997, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23701.536224, 27289.131287, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18991.494400, 24489.055600, 985.984028, 423.706412, 56.509600, X, Y) && !ellipse(22556.350403, 23569.554718, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20914.918365, 23643.916779, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23554.227234, 22795.159668, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Jun 5 15:01:59 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12.gif [Wed Jun 5 15:13:17 2013] Mean detx,y = (3861.78, 576.28) [Wed Jun 5 15:13:20 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed Jun 5 15:13:42 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed Jun 5 15:13:43 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Jun 5 15:13:43 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_bgd.pi.gz [Wed Jun 5 15:43:37 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed Jun 5 15:43:37 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed Jun 5 17:08:38 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed Jun 5 17:08:38 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_src_b10.pi.gz = 247.00 [Wed Jun 5 17:08:38 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_bgd.pi.gz = 889.00 [Wed Jun 5 17:08:38 2013] Got source and background scale factors 939436.000000, 4805453.000000 [Wed Jun 5 17:08:38 2013] User source parameters: Position = (244.2, 284.3) = 17 34 56.54 -32 34 20.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = 73.2 +/- 16.7 Background aperture counts = 173.8 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009 [Wed Jun 5 17:08:38 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Wed Jun 5 17:08:38 2013] Set source signif. to 73.21/13.18 = 5.55 [Wed Jun 5 17:08:43 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed Jun 5 17:08:43 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00399, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12.arf [Wed Jun 5 17:08:43 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed Jun 5 17:08:43 2013] Updating source flux to 3.5e-14 [Wed Jun 5 17:09:02 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Wed Jun 5 17:09:07 2013] xmm0001730201/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0001730201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src12_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete