[Tue Sep 27 11:45:00 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (722.9, 945.6) = 10 46 20.63 -60 5 53.7
  Extent = 1.4" x 0.8", rotation angle = 61 degrees
  Source counts = 12.8 +/- 4.2
  Background counts = 5.2
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 7e-05

[Tue Sep 27 11:45:02 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.99'
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:13 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:13 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.62"
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:13 2011] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 57, mask sum = 56, frac = 0.971
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:13 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 0, mean size = 1.62"
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:16 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src61.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:16 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:16 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src61 appears to have run properly
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:17 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:17 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:47:17 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61 appears to have run properly
[Tue Sep 27 11:48:02 2011] Warning: source 61 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 72 at 18.324554 pixels away
[Tue Sep 27 11:48:02 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep 27 11:48:02 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep 27 11:48:02 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep 27 11:48:02 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep 27 11:48:02 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.70
[Tue Sep 27 11:48:02 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:13 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:13 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.62"
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:13 2011] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 57, mask sum = 56, frac = 0.971
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:13 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 1, mean size = 1.62"
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:16 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src61.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:16 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src61.csv
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:16 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src61_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:16 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src61.csv
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:16 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:18 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:18 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep 27 11:49:18 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf09485_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61 appears to have run properly
[Tue Sep 27 11:50:04 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 22.469800, observed total counts = 22.000000
[Tue Sep 27 11:50:04 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 72 = 8.046183 pixels
[Tue Sep 27 11:50:04 2011] 24.028782 total counts/ 24.028700 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000017
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 72 = 8.046183 pixels
  Position = (716.3, 941.1) = 10 46 21.10 -60 5 56.2
  Extent = 2.0 (0.4-3.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 4.9
  Background counts = 24.0
  Rate = 1e-09 +/- 9e-05
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability