[Fri Sep 23 03:55:18 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (317.0, 900.5) = 17 46 15.47 -28 55 41.7 Extent = 0.8" x 0.5", rotation angle = 159 degrees Source counts = 12.0 +/- 4.0 Background counts = 4.0 Rate = 0.0002 +/- 8e-05 [Fri Sep 23 03:55:22 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.54' [Fri Sep 23 03:58:05 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Sep 23 03:58:05 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.70" [Fri Sep 23 03:58:05 2011] source mask rpix=1.4, npix_max = 14, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.809 [Fri Sep 23 03:58:05 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 0.70" [Fri Sep 23 03:58:09 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists [Fri Sep 23 03:58:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src20.csv [Fri Sep 23 03:58:09 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists [Fri Sep 23 03:58:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src20.csv [Fri Sep 23 03:58:09 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Sep 23 03:58:11 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists [Fri Sep 23 03:58:11 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv [Fri Sep 23 03:58:11 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists [Fri Sep 23 03:58:11 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv [Fri Sep 23 03:58:11 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Sep 23 03:58:34 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.452600, observed total counts = 18.000000 [Fri Sep 23 03:58:34 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 21 = 0.751948 pixels Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 21 = 0.751948 pixels Position = (317.7, 900.8) = 17 46 15.46 -28 55 41.8 Extent = 0.9 (0.7-1.2)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 16.0 +/- 4.0 Background counts = 0.0 Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05 [Fri Sep 23 03:58:34 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Sep 23 03:58:34 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Sep 23 03:58:34 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Fri Sep 23 03:58:34 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Sep 23 03:58:34 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Sep 23 03:59:36 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Sep 23 03:59:36 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.91" [Fri Sep 23 03:59:36 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.136 [Fri Sep 23 03:59:36 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 0.91" [Fri Sep 23 03:59:50 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists [Fri Sep 23 03:59:50 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists [Fri Sep 23 03:59:50 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src15 appears to have run properly [Fri Sep 23 03:59:51 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists [Fri Sep 23 03:59:51 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv [Fri Sep 23 03:59:51 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists [Fri Sep 23 03:59:51 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv [Fri Sep 23 03:59:51 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf00945_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 21.126000, observed total counts = 23.000000 [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 21 = 0.620607 pixels [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] 22.271750 total counts/ 9.068350 bgd. counts: snr = 4.384516 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 21 = 0.620607 pixels Position = (317.1, 901.0) = 17 46 15.48 -28 55 41.7 Extent = 1.0" x 0.6", rotation angle = 42 Source counts = 13.2 +/- 4.7 Background counts = 9.1 Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001 [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.68 [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] Source is asymmetric [Fri Sep 23 04:00:28 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9