[Tue Oct  4 23:35:59 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (492.0, 484.5) = 11 15 46.47 1 26 58.0
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 56 degrees
  Source counts = 10.0 +/- 3.3
  Background counts = 1.0
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05

[Tue Oct  4 23:36:05 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.90'
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:22 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:22 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.14"
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:22 2011] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.945
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:22 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 1.14"
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:24 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf09375_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:44 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 11.925400, observed total counts = 15.000000
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:44 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.747105 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.747105 pixels
  Position = (492.5, 485.0) = 11 15 46.47 1 26 58.0
  Extent = 0.5 (0.4-0.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 11.2 +/- 3.3
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:44 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:44 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:44 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:44 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:44 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Oct  4 23:39:44 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8