[Tue Feb 14 00:34:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (299.6, 642.5) = 17 45 31.58 -29 3 6.7
  Extent = 0.8" x 0.5", rotation angle = 9 degrees
  Source counts = 12.8 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 3.2
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0001

[Tue Feb 14 00:34:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.59'
[Tue Feb 14 01:58:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Feb 14 01:58:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.72"
[Tue Feb 14 01:58:55 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 15, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.786
[Tue Feb 14 01:58:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 0, mean size = 0.72"
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:45 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src40.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:45 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:46 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:46 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Tue Feb 14 02:39:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf09171_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Feb 14 02:40:08 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 16.557600, observed total counts = 20.000000
[Tue Feb 14 02:40:08 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 38 = 0.729007 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 38 = 0.729007 pixels
  Position = (300.2, 642.9) = 17 45 31.58 -29 3 6.8
  Extent = 1.1 (0.8-1.5)" x 0.6 (0.4-0.9)", rotation angle = 176 (329-0) degrees
  Source counts = 17.2 +/- 4.1
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0001
[Tue Feb 14 02:40:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Feb 14 02:40:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Feb 14 02:40:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Feb 14 02:40:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Feb 14 02:40:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.87
[Tue Feb 14 02:40:08 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9