[Fri Oct  7 22:31:14 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (405.6, 981.5) = 16 40 18.97 46 51 41.0
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 53 degrees
  Source counts = 19.2 +/- 4.9
  Background counts = 4.8
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0001

[Fri Oct  7 22:31:15 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.90'
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:48 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:48 2011] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:48 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.76"
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:48 2011] source mask rpix=5.6, npix_max = 149, mask sum = 116, frac = 0.776
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:48 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 2.76"
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:49 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:49 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:49 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:49 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:49 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 22:32:49 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:00 2011] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 18 at 31.672331 pixels away
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:00 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:00 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:00 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:00 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:00 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:24 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:24 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.76"
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:24 2011] source mask rpix=5.6, npix_max = 149, mask sum = 116, frac = 0.776
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:24 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 2.76"
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:24 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:24 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:24 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:25 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:25 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:25 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd6_acisf00896_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:33 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 80.346600, observed total counts = 83.000000
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:33 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 1.349269 pixels
[Fri Oct  7 22:33:33 2011] 79.840200 total counts/ 68.872300 bgd. counts: snr = 1.321604
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 1.349269 pixels
  Position = (406.3, 982.7) = 16 40 18.96 46 51 41.3
  Extent = 0.7" x 0.7", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 11.0 +/- 8.9
  Background counts = 68.9
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability