[Wed Sep 28 09:59:01 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (757.0, 431.5) = 12 19 18.06 5 49 54.2
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 11 degrees
  Source counts = 10.4 +/- 3.5
  Background counts = 1.6
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001

[Wed Sep 28 09:59:02 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.23'
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:48 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:48 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:48 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.919
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:48 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 45 for pass 0, mean size = 0.38"
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:52 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:52 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:52 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:52 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:52 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:55 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:55 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.csv
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:55 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:55 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.csv
[Wed Sep 28 09:59:55 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:06 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 11.012200, observed total counts = 14.000000
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:06 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 49 = 0.452192 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 49 = 0.452192 pixels
  Position = (757.2, 431.9) = 12 19 18.07 5 49 54.2
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.3", rotation angle = 1
  Source counts = 11.6 +/- 3.4
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:06 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:06 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:06 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:06 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:06 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.41
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:06 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:18 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:18 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.46"
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:18 2011] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.105
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:18 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 42 for pass 1, mean size = 0.46"
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:23 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src42.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src42.csv
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:23 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src42_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src42.csv
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:23 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:25 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:25 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:25 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:25 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:25 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00834_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:34 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 10.066000, observed total counts = 14.000000
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:34 2011] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 49
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:34 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:34 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:34 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:34 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:34 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.41
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:34 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Wed Sep 28 10:00:34 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9