[Fri Oct  7 07:51:26 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (849.6, 656.1) = 17 32 56.98 43 42 12.9
  Extent = 0.9" x 0.7", rotation angle = 149 degrees
  Source counts = 13.2 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 2.8
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0001

[Fri Oct  7 07:51:27 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.72'
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:41 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:41 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.07"
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:41 2011] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.048
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:41 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 1.07"
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:42 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:42 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:42 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:42 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:42 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:43 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:43 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:43 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:54 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.390500, observed total counts = 18.000000
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:54 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.952388 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.952388 pixels
  Position = (849.6, 657.0) = 17 32 57.00 43 42 13.1
  Extent = 1.0 (0.7-1.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 14.9 +/- 3.9
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0001
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:54 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:54 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:54 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:54 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Oct  7 07:52:54 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:18 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:18 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.96"
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:18 2011] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.831
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:18 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 0.96"
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:18 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:18 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:18 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:18 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:18 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:19 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:19 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:19 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf07322_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11 appears to have run properly
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:31 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 19.822000, observed total counts = 20.000000
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:31 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.119406 pixels
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:31 2011] 19.679450 total counts/ 7.932250 bgd. counts: snr = 4.170961
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.119406 pixels
  Position = (849.6, 656.9) = 17 32 57.00 43 42 13.0
  Extent = 0.8 (0.4-1.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 11.7 +/- 4.4
  Background counts = 7.9
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:31 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:31 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:31 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:31 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:31 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Oct  7 07:53:31 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9