[Tue Oct 18 13:59:42 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (745.5, 542.9) = 10 47 49.81 12 34 55.0 Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 131 degrees Source counts = 155.6 +/- 12.9 Background counts = 11.4 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0002 [Tue Oct 18 13:59:46 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.26' [Tue Oct 18 14:01:11 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Oct 18 14:01:11 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38" [Tue Oct 18 14:01:11 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.916 [Tue Oct 18 14:01:11 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 0.38" [Tue Oct 18 14:01:13 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Tue Oct 18 14:01:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Tue Oct 18 14:01:13 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Oct 18 14:01:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Tue Oct 18 14:01:13 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Oct 18 14:01:14 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Tue Oct 18 14:01:14 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Tue Oct 18 14:01:14 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Oct 18 14:01:14 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Tue Oct 18 14:01:14 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf07074_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Oct 18 14:01:39 2011] Source 9 is offset by 3.666715 and -4.240689 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.266431 x 2.266431, not incorporating fit results [Tue Oct 18 14:01:39 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 460.567000, observed total counts = 480.000000 [Tue Oct 18 14:01:39 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.104103 pixels [Tue Oct 18 14:01:39 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 17 [Tue Oct 18 14:01:39 2011] 509.057592 total counts/ 509.057000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000026 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.104103 pixels Position = (745.2, 539.8) = 10 47 49.83 12 34 53.3 Extent = 1.5 (0.1-3.0)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 0.0 +/- 22.6 Background counts = 509.1 Rate = 9e-09 +/- 0.0003 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability