[Tue Feb 28 15:18:33 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (699.1, 1013.2) = 17 45 40.58 -29 23 57.5 Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 3 degrees Source counts = 13.5 +/- 3.9 Background counts = 1.5 Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0001 [Tue Feb 28 15:18:35 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.62' [Tue Feb 28 15:58:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Feb 28 15:58:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.72" [Tue Feb 28 15:58:38 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 15, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.031 [Tue Feb 28 15:58:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 0.72" [Tue Feb 28 16:40:48 2012] fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists [Tue Feb 28 16:40:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Tue Feb 28 16:40:48 2012] fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists [Tue Feb 28 16:40:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Tue Feb 28 16:40:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Feb 28 16:40:49 2012] fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Tue Feb 28 16:40:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Tue Feb 28 16:40:49 2012] fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Tue Feb 28 16:40:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Tue Feb 28 16:40:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf07040_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Feb 28 19:42:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 14.424900, observed total counts = 18.000000 [Tue Feb 28 19:42:32 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.440902 pixels [Tue Feb 28 19:42:32 2012] 15.685420 total counts/ 1.467020 bgd. counts: snr = 11.739043 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.440902 pixels Position = (699.3, 1013.6) = 17 45 40.59 -29 23 57.6 Extent = 0.7 (0.3-0.8)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 14.2 +/- 4.0 Background counts = 1.5 Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0001 [Tue Feb 28 19:42:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Feb 28 19:42:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Feb 28 19:42:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Tue Feb 28 19:42:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Feb 28 19:42:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Feb 28 19:42:32 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9