[Sat Oct 29 18:03:53 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1260.4, 756.2) = 16 47 32.15 -45 57 59.1
  Extent = 1.9" x 1.0", rotation angle = 67 degrees
  Source counts = 10.4 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 3.6
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002

[Sat Oct 29 18:03:53 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.58'
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:41 2011] Using EEF radius (= 3.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:41 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 3.25"
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:41 2011] source mask rpix=6.6, npix_max = 201, mask sum = 210, frac = 1.040
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:41 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 3.25"
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:41 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:41 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:41 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:41 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:41 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:42 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:42 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:42 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:49 2011] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 37.624904 pixels away
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:49 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:49 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:49 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:49 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:49 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.94
[Sat Oct 29 18:04:49 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] Using EEF radius (= 3.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 3.25"
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] source mask rpix=6.6, npix_max = 201, mask sum = 210, frac = 1.040
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 3.25"
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src5 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:12 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf06283_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:20 2011] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 37.119911 pixels away
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:20 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:20 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:20 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:20 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:20 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.94
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:20 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Sat Oct 29 18:05:20 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9