[Mon Oct 24 21:40:08 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (657.8, 509.5) = 17 44 32.67 -29 22 18.7
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 63 degrees
  Source counts = 38.2 +/- 6.6
  Background counts = 5.8
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 7e-05

[Mon Oct 24 21:40:14 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.62'
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:33 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:33 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.04"
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:33 2011] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.920
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:33 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 1.04"
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:34 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:34 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:34 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:34 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:34 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:36 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:36 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:36 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:36 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:36 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:19 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 36.691000, observed total counts = 48.000000
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:19 2011] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:19 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:19 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:19 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:19 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:19 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.03
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:58 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:58 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.04"
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:58 2011] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.920
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:58 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 1.04"
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:59 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:30 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 41.974200, observed total counts = 48.000000
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:30 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.797215 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.797215 pixels
  Position = (658.5, 509.9) = 17 44 32.67 -29 22 18.7
  Extent = 1.0" x 0.6", rotation angle = 305
  Source counts = 45.6 +/- 6.8
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 7e-05
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:30 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:30 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:30 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:30 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:30 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.64
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:30 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:30 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0