[Mon Oct 24 21:39:55 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (160.2, 1091.2) = 17 44 17.86 -29 27 8.2
  Extent = 0.8" x 0.5", rotation angle = 167 degrees
  Source counts = 11.8 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 2.2
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 4e-05

[Mon Oct 24 21:39:57 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.18'
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:22 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:22 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:22 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 4, frac = 0.614
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:22 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 0.38"
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:23 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:23 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:23 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src19 appears to have run properly
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:24 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:24 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:24 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:24 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:54 2011] Source 19 is offset by -2.906661 and -3.906661 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.390130 x 0.390130, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:54 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:54 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:54 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:54 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:54 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.63
[Mon Oct 24 21:42:54 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:48 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:48 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:48 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 4, frac = 0.614
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:48 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 0.38"
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:49 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:49 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:49 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:49 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:49 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:50 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:50 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Mon Oct 24 21:43:50 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf05892_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:12 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 7.712590, observed total counts = 27.000000
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:12 2011] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:12 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:12 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:12 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:12 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:12 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.63
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:12 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Mon Oct 24 21:44:12 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9