[Sun Sep 25 19:06:15 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (65.5, 740.5) = 2 26 41.24 62 1 58.2
  Extent = 2.1" x 0.7", rotation angle = 99 degrees
  Source counts = 16.0 +/- 4.5
  Background counts = 4.0
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0001

[Sun Sep 25 19:06:15 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.12'
[Sun Sep 25 19:08:58 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Sep 25 19:08:58 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.92"
[Sun Sep 25 19:08:58 2011] source mask rpix=5.9, npix_max = 165, mask sum = 169, frac = 1.023
[Sun Sep 25 19:08:58 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 0, mean size = 2.92"
[Sun Sep 25 19:08:59 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src35.ximg exists
[Sun Sep 25 19:08:59 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src35_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep 25 19:08:59 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src35 appears to have run properly
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:00 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:00 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:00 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35 appears to have run properly
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:40 2011] Warning: source 35 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 64 at 33.527768 pixels away
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:40 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:40 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:40 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:40 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:40 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 3.12
[Sun Sep 25 19:09:40 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:32 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:32 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.92"
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:32 2011] source mask rpix=5.9, npix_max = 165, mask sum = 169, frac = 1.023
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:32 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 1, mean size = 2.92"
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:33 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src35.ximg exists
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:33 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src35.csv
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:33 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src35_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:33 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src35.csv
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:33 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:34 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:34 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep 25 19:10:34 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf05890_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35 appears to have run properly
[Sun Sep 25 19:11:14 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 59.047400, observed total counts = 58.000000
[Sun Sep 25 19:11:14 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 64 = 0.716150 pixels
[Sun Sep 25 19:11:14 2011] 57.636990 total counts/ 49.405200 bgd. counts: snr = 1.171138
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 64 = 0.716150 pixels
  Position = (65.5, 739.8) = 2 26 41.27 62 1 57.6
  Extent = 0.7" x 0.7", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 8.2 +/- 7.6
  Background counts = 49.4
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 0.0002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability