[Sat Oct 1 15:06:03 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (1064.4, 763.4) = 3 36 23.24 -34 58 35.8 Extent = 2.0" x 1.7", rotation angle = 169 degrees Source counts = 11.4 +/- 4.0 Background counts = 4.6 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006 [Sat Oct 1 15:06:03 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.25' [Sat Oct 1 15:06:48 2011] Using EEF radius (= 5.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Oct 1 15:06:48 2011] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Sat Oct 1 15:06:48 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.63" [Sat Oct 1 15:06:48 2011] source mask rpix=11.4, npix_max = 570, mask sum = 563, frac = 0.986 [Sat Oct 1 15:06:48 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 5.63" [Sat Oct 1 15:06:50 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists [Sat Oct 1 15:06:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv [Sat Oct 1 15:06:50 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists [Sat Oct 1 15:06:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv [Sat Oct 1 15:06:50 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Oct 1 15:06:50 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists [Sat Oct 1 15:06:50 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists [Sat Oct 1 15:06:50 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly [Sat Oct 1 15:06:55 2011] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 64.095558 pixels away [Sat Oct 1 15:06:55 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Oct 1 15:06:55 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Oct 1 15:06:55 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Oct 1 15:06:55 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Oct 1 15:06:55 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.19 [Sat Oct 1 15:07:09 2011] Using EEF radius (= 5.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Oct 1 15:07:09 2011] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Sat Oct 1 15:07:09 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.63" [Sat Oct 1 15:07:09 2011] source mask rpix=11.4, npix_max = 570, mask sum = 563, frac = 0.986 [Sat Oct 1 15:07:09 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 5.63" [Sat Oct 1 15:07:10 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists [Sat Oct 1 15:07:10 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists [Sat Oct 1 15:07:10 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4 appears to have run properly [Sat Oct 1 15:07:10 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists [Sat Oct 1 15:07:10 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists [Sat Oct 1 15:07:10 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf05809_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly [Sat Oct 1 15:07:15 2011] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 64.095558 pixels away [Sat Oct 1 15:07:15 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Oct 1 15:07:15 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Oct 1 15:07:15 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Oct 1 15:07:15 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Oct 1 15:07:15 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.19 [Sat Oct 1 15:07:15 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9