[Fri Oct 14 14:57:30 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1106.7, 429.1) = 12 16 28.54 47 9 14.2
  Extent = 1.8" x 0.8", rotation angle = 17 degrees
  Source counts = 14.3 +/- 4.4
  Background counts = 4.7
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 6e-05

[Fri Oct 14 14:57:30 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.98'
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.82"
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] source mask rpix=5.7, npix_max = 155, mask sum = 156, frac = 1.006
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 2.82"
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:37 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:46 2011] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 32.244119 pixels away
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:46 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:46 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:46 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:46 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:46 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.18
[Fri Oct 14 14:58:46 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.82"
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] source mask rpix=5.7, npix_max = 155, mask sum = 156, frac = 1.006
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 2.82"
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:13 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf04738_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:22 2011] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 32.763661 pixels away
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:22 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:22 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:22 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:22 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:22 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.18
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:22 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Fri Oct 14 14:59:22 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9