[Tue Mar 13 11:58:01 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (454.7, 571.3) = 23 18 27.31 -42 22 26.7
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 86 degrees
  Source counts = 13.2 +/- 4.1
  Background counts = 3.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Mar 13 11:58:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.47'
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:44 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.329
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 0.39"
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00436_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:49 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 7.222930, observed total counts = 9.000000
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:49 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.559928 pixels
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:49 2012] 6.873661 total counts/ 0.002861 bgd. counts: snr = 128.448833
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.559928 pixels
  Position = (455.0, 571.8) = 23 18 27.32 -42 22 26.7
  Extent = 0.3 (0.2-0.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 6.9 +/- 2.6
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0005
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 13 11:58:49 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8