[Fri Sep 23 15:00:43 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (132.3, 933.2) = 3 36 51.75 -35 56 43.5
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 130 degrees
  Source counts = 15.3 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 0.7
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002

[Fri Sep 23 15:00:44 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.39'
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:30 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:30 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.67"
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:30 2011] source mask rpix=1.4, npix_max = 13, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.164
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:30 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 0.67"
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:31 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf04076_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:39 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 13.913600, observed total counts = 17.000000
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:39 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.791571 pixels
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:39 2011] 14.378593 total counts/ 0.021693 bgd. counts: snr = 97.476486
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.791571 pixels
  Position = (132.5, 934.0) = 3 36 51.76 -35 56 43.4
  Extent = 0.6 (0.5-0.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 14.4 +/- 3.8
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0002
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:39 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:39 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:39 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:39 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:39 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep 23 15:01:39 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9