[Sun Oct 30 00:25:02 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (652.5, 819.9) = 14 13 3.17 -65 20 43.4
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 79 degrees
  Source counts = 21.7 +/- 4.9
  Background counts = 2.3
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0002

[Sun Oct 30 00:25:04 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.42'
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:55 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:55 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:55 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.900
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:55 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 26 for pass 0, mean size = 0.39"
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:56 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src26.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:56 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src26.csv
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:56 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src26_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:56 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src26.csv
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:56 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src26_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:57 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:57 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26.csv
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:57 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:57 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26.csv
[Sun Oct 30 00:25:57 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:10 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 26.149400, observed total counts = 33.000000
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:10 2011] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:10 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:10 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:10 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:10 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:10 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:29 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:29 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:29 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.900
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:29 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 1, mean size = 0.39"
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:30 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src25.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:30 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:30 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:30 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:30 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:31 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:31 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:31 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:31 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00356_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:41 2011] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 25 at 459.782787 pixels away
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:41 2011] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 25 at 10.312365 pixels away
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:41 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:41 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:41 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:41 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:41 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Oct 30 00:26:41 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9