[Sat Oct 15 19:41:16 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (207.1, 869.1) = 12 11 0.79 39 25 9.4
  Extent = 1.6" x 1.2", rotation angle = 150 degrees
  Source counts = 20.1 +/- 5.2
  Background counts = 6.9
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0002

[Sat Oct 15 19:41:17 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.96'
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:12 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:12 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.61"
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:12 2011] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 57, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.122
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:12 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 0, mean size = 1.61"
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:14 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00348_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src21.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:14 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00348_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src21.csv
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:14 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00348_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:14 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf00348_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src21.csv
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:14 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf00348_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf00348_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:15 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00348_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:15 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf00348_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:15 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd7_acisf00348_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:30 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 32.137200, observed total counts = 27.000000
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:30 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 52 = 2.758552 pixels
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:30 2011] 34.135200 total counts/ 25.346300 bgd. counts: snr = 1.745731
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 52 = 2.758552 pixels
  Position = (209.6, 868.0) = 12 11 0.70 39 25 8.6
  Extent = 1.5" x 1.5", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 8.8 +/- 5.8
  Background counts = 25.3
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0002
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:30 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:30 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:30 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:30 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:30 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:52 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:52 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.50"
[Sat Oct 15 19:42:52 2011] Spatial fitting skipped for pass 1: source                                 has 8.8 net counts, is at off-axis angle 6.0'
[Sat Oct 15 19:43:12 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct 15 19:43:12 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct 15 19:43:12 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Oct 15 19:43:12 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct 15 19:43:12 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Oct 15 19:43:12 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9