[Wed Sep 21 04:48:30 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (913.0, 251.7) = 17 45 56.66 -29 0 10.5 Extent = 0.9" x 0.5", rotation angle = 105 degrees Source counts = 10.6 +/- 5.0 Background counts = 14.4 Rate = 7e-05 +/- 3e-05 [Wed Sep 21 04:48:34 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.48' [Wed Sep 21 04:54:12 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Sep 21 04:54:12 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.69" [Wed Sep 21 04:54:12 2011] source mask rpix=1.4, npix_max = 14, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.113 [Wed Sep 21 04:54:12 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 0.69" [Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists [Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src89.csv [Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src89.csv [Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Sep 21 04:54:17 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists [Wed Sep 21 04:54:17 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 21 04:54:17 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89 appears to have run properly [Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Source 91 is offset by -4.346950 and 5.324869 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.766254 x 0.766254, not incorporating fit results [Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.85 [Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Source is asymmetric [Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8