[Wed Sep 21 04:48:29 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (838.2, 223.5) = 17 45 59.47 -29 0 24.4
  Extent = 0.7" x 0.6", rotation angle = 24 degrees
  Source counts = 19.7 +/- 5.5
  Background counts = 10.3
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 3e-05

[Wed Sep 21 04:48:34 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.09'
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:12 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:12 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.86"
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:12 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.992
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:12 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 0, mean size = 0.86"
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79.csv
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79.csv
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:14 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:17 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:17 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 21 04:54:17 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79 appears to have run properly
[Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Source 79 is offset by -6.813760 and 6.513955 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.872565 x 0.872565, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep 21 04:55:20 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.31
[Wed Sep 21 04:56:56 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep 21 04:56:56 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.86"
[Wed Sep 21 04:56:56 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.992
[Wed Sep 21 04:56:56 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 76 for pass 1, mean size = 0.86"
[Wed Sep 21 04:56:58 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src76.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 21 04:56:58 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src76.csv
[Wed Sep 21 04:56:58 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 21 04:56:58 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src76.csv
[Wed Sep 21 04:56:58 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:02 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:02 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:02 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf03393_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76 appears to have run properly
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:50 2011] Source 79 is offset by -6.813760 and 6.513955 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.872565 x 0.872565, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:50 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:50 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:50 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:50 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:50 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.31
[Wed Sep 21 04:57:50 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9