[Fri Oct 21 10:51:09 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (427.4, 556.7) = 17 20 27.59 35 37 39.8
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 105 degrees
  Source counts = 13.5 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 0.5
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002

[Fri Oct 21 10:51:10 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.00'
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:54 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:54 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.58"
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:54 2011] source mask rpix=1.2, npix_max = 11, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.798
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:54 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 0.58"
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:54 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:54 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:54 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:54 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:54 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:55 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:55 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:55 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:55 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Fri Oct 21 10:51:55 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:04 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 11.884900, observed total counts = 14.000000
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:04 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.532259 pixels
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:04 2011] 12.279865 total counts/ 0.002565 bgd. counts: snr = 242.432315
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.532259 pixels
  Position = (427.9, 556.8) = 17 20 27.59 35 37 39.6
  Extent = 0.5 (0.4-0.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.3 +/- 3.5
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:04 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:04 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:04 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:04 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:04 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:21 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:21 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.46"
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:21 2011] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.737
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:21 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 0.46"
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:22 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:22 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:22 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:22 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:22 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:22 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:22 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:22 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf03280_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11 appears to have run properly
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:29 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 12.325700, observed total counts = 14.000000
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:29 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.061448 pixels
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:29 2011] 12.675026 total counts/ 0.021625 bgd. counts: snr = 86.044707
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.061448 pixels
  Position = (428.0, 556.8) = 17 20 27.58 35 37 39.6
  Extent = 0.5 (0.4-0.8)" x 0.3 (0.2-0.4)", rotation angle = 71 (38-95) degrees
  Source counts = 12.7 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:29 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:29 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:29 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:29 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:29 2011] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.92
[Fri Oct 21 10:52:29 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0