[Tue Apr 10 23:14:31 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (814.0, 827.4) = 3 38 46.57 -35 33 15.5
  Extent = 1.2" x 0.6", rotation angle = 139 degrees
  Source counts = 14.5 +/- 4.2
  Background counts = 3.5
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05

[Tue Apr 10 23:14:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.90'
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 1.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.14"
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.947
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 1.14"
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf00319_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:42 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 23.387000, observed total counts = 26.000000
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:42 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 2.576602 pixels
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:42 2012] 24.320758 total counts/ 0.005858 bgd. counts: snr = 317.693665
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 2.576602 pixels
  Position = (814.0, 830.0) = 3 38 46.59 -35 33 14.4
  Extent = 1.2 (0.8-1.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 24.3 +/- 4.9
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 9e-05
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Apr 10 23:16:42 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9